Ideas

MTD types in analysis fields of VAT Account, could it also put this on the docs inside the vat account? Gives easy access to confirm when a document has been included in a VAT return

When proofreading, and editing are turned on, Reports Wizard only allows the editing of the comment. It would be useful if the proofreader could edit any erroneous grade (eg. A, B, C, D) or judgement (eg. Excellent, Good, Average, Poor) fields.

Teacher teaching multiple subjects or year groups can easily access statements that are most relevant when writing a given set of reports

Show Approvers / limits / missing fields preventing them being on workflow, on column next/under Cost Centre when selected in Purchasing? Allows us to identify at that time if there is a discrepancy from expected approver/s

Management Accounts Report The Account indices are required fields for those transactions/values pull through. Could the report flag this / highlight any missing accounts due to blank account indices when running?

Remove 'Account Required' when using Nominals that have no Ledger link, therefore there is no Account available to select

Include in Budget Check needs to be ticked for all nominals that you want included in the Budget Check when using the Ledger Account mode However this is not very easily identifiable, when clicking the Budget Check on a PORD, could the Budget Chec...

The real issue is that there is no spell-checker function available when using the downloaded Excel spreadsheet, and when the file is then uploaded to iSams, it automatically marks all reports as complete, even if there are spelling errors in the ...

Could Delivery Addresses be added into Financials instead of being held in Distribution? Could the access to these be easier to understand, currently users need access to the Z Nominal which is easy to forget as it's not a 'real' nominal

Could we remove the 'x' on the RDP? Users use this to 'log out' but then get issues with their log in staying connected, which leads to further issues logging in. Could we just remove the option, to prevent this?