Ideas

We have been sent a Unique Learner Number (ULN) for a pupil joining Year 9. We are obliged to pass on this number if he later leaves to go to another state school so it needs to be stored on iSAMS now. But that would require him to be made into an...

Let me run you through our process: When a concern is logged, we DO NOT give the person logging the ability to assign visibility. This is because we don't want them to add in every person they can think of relating to the child, thinking that they...

Seems unnecessary that you can't assign a child a UPN in the school holidays.You're met with "The following error occurred: There is no current Term configured."There is a term configured. I shouldn't have to be in that term to do it. Just one thi...

As the family tree function is no longer in use, we have no way of recording the relationship of one parent to another (eg divorced, separated) - this information can be useful in dealing sensitively with pupils and their families. Please can we e...

When using Email wizard and adding an attachment there is no functionality to attach documents stored within Ed:Gen, the only method is to open the document and save it externally and then add.

This would be useful for admissions and exams staff as pupils will often come to a new setting with a UCI in existence which we have to use to enable linking of results wherever the pupil may move to. It would help if the UCI number could be added...

If a concern is raised with multiple pupils, any update needs to be entered for every pupil individually. This can be very time consuming if there are lots of pupils who (say) happened to be bystanders. Can we create linked updates to what are eff...

It would be really useful if CC'd member of staff able to see the merge fields when sending an email to students. Eg when sending an email home to parents of students who were late on multiple occasions, emails are sent from the office, but sent t...

For example. parents should default to all correspondence, but guardians/agents should not. It would save emails being sent to those that shouldn't get because someone forgot to untick a box

At the moment, when guardian(s) are going to be the primary point of contact and need access to the Parent Portal, they cannot be given access directly. It is necessary to set them up as a Parent contact type, then email the Parent Portal details ...