Add more information to display screen when authorising non-PO invoices.
At the moment, you only see document number, date and who entered invoice to the system. It would be useful to see supplier name, date posted & link to invoice copy on summary screen. Thank you
Irena Bojanic
16 days ago
in IRIS PS Purchasing
1
Planned for a future major release
Preferred name must take precedent when displayed outside of the Employee Record
It was raised to me that people may have a preferred name for quite sensitive reasons, for example someone who is none binary might feel their name reflects to heavily on their gender assigned at birth so identifies with a more gender neutral name...
Outlook Calendar Sync for Absence Management Team Calendar
improve visibility of absences by enabling integration between the absence calendar in the HR platform and Microsoft Outlook. This would allow approved absences to automatically appear in users’ Outlook calendars (i.e. a line manager), streamlinin...
Once an order is approved it cant be amended. If an order is raised against the wrong nominal code this creates a commitment against the wrong nominal code and wrong budget line. This cant be corrected while the invoice has been received. Can cert...
When we raise a REQ we can add an attachment but when we convert that REQ into a PORD the attachment is not carried forward onto the PORD. We use this for quotes etc. What we would like is for this document to appear at every stage up until INV. A...
Sarah Egginton
about 2 years ago
in IRIS PS Purchasing
2
Under Investigation
Any document uploaded against a candidate or by the candidate in the ATS to pull through to the Employee documents area to futher reduce workload and duplicate data entry.
Ability to create a contract of employment for a candidate matching the job role information with the information from the candidate portal. With an option to e-sign the document before converting to an employee.
Currently schools cannot do partial refunds and are ONLY able to refund against transaction lines - feedback has been that this is a relatively rigid model, especially with partial refunds not being available.