Ideas

We have a category 'Events' and for that we want a form completed giving lots of details about the event so that it covers everything from furniture setups to letters required and refreshments needed. If a user selects the category event we want i...

When items are flagged in a checklist - they should automatically be raised as an issue. The only way I would know if a school has issues within the checklists is if I physically open and scroll through - not a great use of my time.

When safeguarding documentation such as DBS checks are added to supplier profiles it would be helpful for this to be shared with all property's. Suppliers are active across multiple sites and are having to send the information to each individually.

We set our own descriptions on our MAT, if I were to change a description at MAT level. It doesn't take effect at school level even though they are mapped. This then means you have to go into each property and change each description seperately.

Let users first select the location to filter the supplier list when raising req/po etc. Relevant for users who have access to multiple locations, mainly Central teams. Makes it easier to find a location supplier, rather than scrolling through 20+...

If there was an option to create additional fields, for example activity specific instructions, sequence of works or any other relevant information, this could make the delivery of the activity more efficient.

Allow ability to identify compliance actions that are scheduled for contractor visit to act as diary/calander

Most MATS will want oversight of property contracts to consider central procurement and cost savings and efficiencies. The current report does not include supplier information column (although it shows on the dashboard so not sure why it wouldn't ...

My supplier sent me his insurance certificate but I couldn't attach it. It can only be done by the supplier. Alot of suppliers don't really want to use the system, they are builders with little IT skills but I still want to be able to prove we did...

Display original details in a greyed-out section above the fields for reference. Easier to see what they original REQ vs PO vs GRN vs INV looked like without coming out and back in again