Batch Invoice description to show as entered in the purchase ledger supplier account
when you process an item purchase invoice the description entered is only viewable in the general ledger. In the purchase ledger and supplier account it shows as the account name/invoice number/value. When processing a batch purchase invoice the d...
Automated return of deposit on leavers final invoices
If the leaving date or term of a pupil was able to be entered into iSams/Fee Billing and Fee Billing then knew that any deposit registered as being held needed to be added to the final bill for that pupil, it would be much more efficient and need ...
Fix transactions' analysis code imported to iFinance debtors account from Fee Billing
When transactions are imported from Fee Billing into iFinance, a BI/analysis code (cost centre - dept) is attached to the debit side of the transactions that is posted to debtors control. This may be acceptable for single line invoices, but make n...
Could we have a field on the analysis codes so that we can ID the VAT status of each cost centre eg Vatable, Partial Exemption, Not Vat Recoverable. This would ease the partial exemption calculation once data is exported to excel
Allow negative values when posting lodgments from bank feed
When processing lodgments from the bank feed, it would be good to be able to enter negative values, as most of our lodgments have card transaction fees included, so the full income needs to be posted separate from the fee. Currently, we process th...
It would be very useful to be able to sort the POs by number. Currently the system has no ability to recognise different number of digits and sorting doesn't work. I am currently using the date sort but the other day there was a glitch, which high...
Email from the new workflow approval system looks to come from recipient
The approval email from the new workflow looks as though it is from the recipient of the email. This is causing some of our members of staff to think that they are receiving phishing email or emails that may be 'nasty'!! Could the recipient be fro...