Ideas

The offence description column to be wider in Discipline Manager (we renamed to Detention Manager). Having is narrow when there is more free space makes it cumbersome to use. Being able to set size globally would be helpful

It would be helpful if GRNs or part of could be written off or cancelled and revert back to PORD in order for it to be written off. We are still learning the system and a few items have been progressed in error which need to be cancelled.

Could detention notifications be sent to students via Teams as so few use their email now as a means of communication

It would be useful to be able to change the terminology from "detention" to "reflection". We prefer to make it clear that this time is a period for mindfulness and reflection after a negative behaviour incident. Additionally, most of our students ...

The ability to run a report to see what has been posted by an individual user. Useful to compare staff workload. Currently the only way to get something similar is to run a document enquiry for the document type but then you're limited to the last...

MTD types in analysis fields of VAT Account, could it also put this on the docs inside the vat account? Gives easy access to confirm when a document has been included in a VAT return

There are two dates associated with pupils when they are added to detentions. One date reflects when the details of that detention have been updated and the other date reflects when that detention was authorised. To authorise/de-authorise detentio...

Can a report be available or an amendment in Accounting to be able to export more lines on the document enquiry when downloading the GL Extract for auditors. Due to the limit of lines several detail enquiries need to be ran in order to obtain all ...

Allow for wider search criteria on the document search in financials purchasing module and allow for it to be exported. Currently you can only search by type, number, modified, date, creator, status, supplier, location and reference. It would be u...

Show Approvers / limits / missing fields preventing them being on workflow, on column next/under Cost Centre when selected in Purchasing? Allows us to identify at that time if there is a discrepancy from expected approver/s