Ideas

As a Trust, having multiple schools and multiple activities can be confusing. The compliance matrix does not pull through all of the MAT monitored activities therefore is not reporting correct data. My suggestion is that in the downloads for excel...

I am undergoing a purchase ledger tidy up, after 14 years of adding accounts, I need to rationalise and combine accounts to become PRF suppliers, however, this is creating a lot of closed accounts, is it possible to create an archive of these acco...

In PSF v6 and earlier, it was possible to run an account enquiry at an ‘as at’ date. This was useful if you wanted to see – for example – which invoices were outstanding at the end of a month which had subsequently been paid, or which transactions...

This would enable at a glance viewing using the search and sort field, especially handy for a Trust with multi sites. .

Can the contracts that are set as naturally expiring, automatically expire on the set date and change the status to ceased and archive themselves? At the moment we rely on each property administration to go in and amend this, the system should be ...

Currently every user has to manually input the report server / report template / smtp settings. When granting a user access to the emailing suite, could admin have the option to 'copy settings from' another user?

We are a growing trust and have recently started using the MAT Compliance Matrix. I have just been on Chat to find out how the matrix can indicate that remedial works are required following a statutory service. I'm extremely disappointed to be adv...

MTD types in analysis fields of VAT Account, could it also put this on the docs inside the vat account? Gives easy access to confirm when a document has been included in a VAT return

When part paying invoices a new SI line is created for the remaining balance but with the reference 'Part Pay ...'. This makes it harder to understand what is for what especially if more than one part payment is made against one invoice. When send...

Show Approvers / limits / missing fields preventing them being on workflow, on column next/under Cost Centre when selected in Purchasing? Allows us to identify at that time if there is a discrepancy from expected approver/s